Project overview

Developing Retrofit Strategies for Historical Masonry Building Aggregates in Zagreb

ZAGGREGATE investigates how neighbouring historic buildings influence one another during earthquakes — and how they can be assessed and retrofitted without shifting risk from one building to the next.

What the project actually does

From earthquake evidence to practical retrofit guidance.

Most assessment methods consider one building at a time. ZAGGREGATE instead studies the full masonry row: buildings of different heights, materials and floor systems that share walls, touch one another and respond together during an earthquake.

01

Study the existing city

Document building configurations, earthquake damage, materials and connections through field surveys, measurements and non-destructive testing in Zagreb.

02

Test and model the interactions

Use laboratory experiments, a large-scale shake-table test and calibrated numerical models to understand how damage develops within an individual building and across the row.

03

Develop safer retrofit strategies

Compare interventions and identify solutions that reduce seismic risk across the aggregate while remaining compatible with Zagreb’s historic architecture.

Field evidenceDamage, geometry and materials
ExperimentsComponents and shake-table tests
Validated modelsBuildings and complete rows
Risk assessmentVulnerability and fragility
Retrofit guidanceTools for engineering practice
Core project outcome

Practical guidance for engineers to model, assess and design seismic retrofits for buildings within historical masonry aggregates.

See how the six work packages deliver this outcome →
Why one-building assessment is not enough

Connected buildings create a different seismic problem.

Historical urban blocks are heterogeneous systems, not repeated copies of one structural unit. Their seismic safety depends on what happens within each building and across the entire row.

01

Interaction

Adjacent buildings influence one another during earthquakes.

02

Irregularity

Heights, floor layouts, materials and openings vary from unit to unit.

03

Connections

Wall–wall and wall–floor connections are often weak or uncertain.

04

Failure modes

In-plane and out-of-plane mechanisms may develop simultaneously.

05

Retrofit effects

Interventions in one building can alter the risk of its neighbours.

The evidence behind the project

The 2020 earthquakes exposed a city-scale challenge.

The Zagreb (ML 5.5) and Petrinja (ML 6.2) earthquakes caused severe damage across Croatia. In Zagreb’s historic centre, many affected buildings are unreinforced masonry units connected in rows and urban blocks.

Post-earthquake inspections showed why the individual-building view is not enough: geometry, floor levels, openings, materials and connections change from one unit to the next, while damage can propagate across the aggregate.

2020Zagreb & Petrinja earthquakes
URMHistoric unreinforced masonry
Block scaleAssessment beyond one building
Three-dimensional post-earthquake damage assessment map of Zagreb
Post-earthquake building assessments reveal the scale and spatial distribution of damage across Zagreb.
Damage assessment and three-dimensional model of Zagreb Block 19
From city to block

Block 19 as a model for evidence-based investigation.

Spatial damage records and three-dimensional building data connect observed earthquake performance with typology, position in the row and interaction between adjacent structures.

Project objectives

Science that leads to safer engineering decisions.

ZAGGREGATE links fundamental research with practical outcomes for engineers, authorities and custodians of historic urban fabric.

Scientific focus

Understand and predict aggregate behaviour.

  • Understand the seismic behaviour of masonry aggregates
  • Develop and validate aggregate-level numerical models
  • Quantify vulnerability and fragility
  • Identify governing damage mechanisms and retrofit effects
  • Establish an evidence-based retrofit framework
Engineering focus

Turn evidence into usable retrofit guidance.

  • Provide validated aggregate-level retrofit strategies
  • Reduce seismic risk beyond isolated buildings
  • Deliver practical engineering tools
  • Support decisions with experiments and verified models
  • Ensure heritage-compatible interventions
From science to engineering practice

Research designed to become usable guidance.

01

Validated models and tools

Methods that represent aggregate-level behaviour and can be tested against evidence.

02

Seismic risk and vulnerability

Quantified performance of historical masonry rows and their constituent units.

03

Heritage-compatible retrofit strategies

Interventions that improve safety while respecting historic fabric.

04

Open knowledge transfer

Datasets, publications, workshops and practical recommendations.